Select Page
The genuine spiritual life

The genuine spiritual life

“Spiritual life, when experienced authentically, constitutes an inner journey, silent and irreducible to external models. Every genuine search begins in the deepest recesses of the soul, where the voices of social approval and the murmur of established formulas cease. However, it is not uncommon for this original impulse toward inner transformation to be absorbed by the institutional dynamics of religious life in community. Far from fostering freedom of spirit, such environments often impose a normative structure, a codified morality, and a collective identity that dissolves uniqueness in the name of belonging.
The community can offer refuge, guidance, and comfort. But it can also become a system that, under benevolent appearances, stifles individual expression through the repetition of ritual gestures, the subordination of thought, and the suspension of self-judgment. In the name of the sacred, obedience is institutionalized, consciences are standardized, and any questioning that disturbs the tranquility of consensus is marginalized. Simone Weil warns that “thought is not easily welcomed where power reigns,” and power—even religious power—resists what it cannot control. Where authenticity is replaced by fidelity to a form, spiritual life vanishes as a living experience and is preserved only as protocol.
Those who enter a religious environment in search of inner guidance often find themselves subjected to a pedagogy that does not cultivate freedom but reinforces dependence. They are taught to venerate memorized formulas, not to discover the meaning that justifies them. They are required to have faith, but they are not offered a path to understanding. Love is invoked, while any form of thought that has not been previously legitimized is discouraged. In this context, the soul that tries to advance on its own is viewed with suspicion, and the contemplative impulse is replaced by the mechanical repetition of what has been prescribed. Far from being kindled, the inner flame is consumed under the weight of custom.
Not every form of shared life deserves to be discarded. But when the community demands the suspension of personal judgment as proof of virtue, what is formed is not a spiritual consciousness, but a subject functional to the logic of the group. Where rituals are valued more than inner transformation, one ends up revering an empty form, not a living presence. In the words of Kierkegaard:
“The crowd is the lie.”
(Diary, 1851), and it is precisely because it nullifies individual responsibility in the name of undifferentiated belonging.
True spiritual experience does not require external approval, uniformity, or regulatory validation. It can mature in anonymous retreat, in the silence of an ordinary life, or in the lucidity of a consciousness that dares to think without guidance. It does not impose external abstinence as a merit in itself, but demands constant vigilance of the inner world. It does not call for separation from the environment, but rather a transformed gaze that illuminates its meaning. It does not depend on the recognition of a group, but on fidelity to an inner voice that does not always coincide with the dominant voice.
Meister Eckhart expresses it with radical clarity:
“As long as the soul seeks outside itself, it will not find the truth. The truth is found only in the depths of the soul, where God dwells without image.”
This is not an anti-institutional experience, but a demand for ontological depth that cannot be administered collectively. Those who have known the truth at the center of their being understand that this experience cannot be organized, transmitted by decree, or administered as doctrine. It is revealed in the unrepeatable space of intimacy, in the thrill of lucidity, in the solitary decision to live according to what one has understood. And that fidelity, even if it is not celebrated by others, is enough.”
Prabhuji
Being yourself

Being yourself

“Don’t be afraid to be different, not on a whim, but out of loyalty to what makes you who you are. What disorients us is not the complexity of the world, but the attempt to adapt to models that do not belong to us. Alienation begins when we sacrifice our uniqueness for approval. As Kierkegaard warned, ‘the greatest despair is not wanting to be oneself.’
Be different because no one who has transformed history was a copy or an imitation. From Socrates to Simone Weil, those who thought against the grain did not seek acceptance: they sought truth, authenticity.
In the Gospel according to Mark, it is said:
καὶ τί γὰρ ὠφελεῖ ἄνθρωπον κερδῆσαι τὸν κόσμον ὅλον καὶ ζημιωθῆναι τὴν ψυχὴν αὐτοῦ;
What good is it for a man to gain the whole world if he loses his soul?
(Mk 8:36)
Being yourself requires courage, bravery, and an adventurous spirit. The desire to fit in can silence the inner voice that calls us to live authentically.
Be different because truth does not lie in consensus. As Nietzsche pointed out, “the individual has always fought not to be absorbed by the tribe.”
Difference is not a luxury: it is a spiritual necessity. Fitting in can provide security; being authentic offers meaning.
Do not fear criticism or external judgment. Those who adapt out of fear end up betraying their essence. Those who remain true to themselves, even in solitude, live with integrity.
Don’t be afraid to be different, because what lasts is not appearance, but the truth that each person is capable of sustaining.”
Prabhuji
Authenticity

Authenticity

“There is a moment—not always obvious, but decisive—when the compulsion to accumulate weakens and the need to understand imposes itself with silent force. The desire remains, but its orientation is transformed. It ceases to be driven by quantity and begins to seek direction. It no longer aspires to excess, but to truth. This vital inflection does not usually manifest itself with spectacular gestures or fireworks. It bursts into the ordinary: into the emptiness that follows a goal achieved, into the unease that follows a meaningless celebration, into the fatigue that cannot be explained by physical exertion alone. In this unscheduled interruption, a question arises that, although it has no definite form, demands an answer.
My friend, the search for meaning does not consist of avoiding suffering or idealizing joy. It implies, first and foremost, a willingness to listen. Listening not in the passive sense, but as an act of radical attention to that which has been buried by the demands of others, unconscious repetitions, and narratives that one has accepted without having chosen them. As Søren Kierkegaard points out, truth is not imposed from outside; it is appropriated through existential internalization. Authenticity, then, is not equivalent to arbitrary self-assertion. It is a form of responsibility to what has been clearly and lucidly recognized as true.
In a historical context marked by acceleration, simulation, and the imperative of visibility, choosing an authentic life is an act of resistance. It is not a matter of ideological opposition, but of silent fidelity to a truth that does not need to be justified. Rejecting prefabricated scripts requires the courage to declare, “This does not represent me.” But it also requires accepting, “This commits me, even if it makes me uncomfortable.” As Friedrich Nietzsche wrote, “He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.” However, that why is not inherited: it must be discovered and chosen or elected. Meaning is not achieved like solving an equation. It is cultivated, as Zen master Dōgen observes, in the way one walks, eats, speaks, and works. It does not require heroic gestures. It dwells in consistency without witnesses, in words that do not betray, in silent decisions. In this mode of presence, time ceases to push forward. It begins to unfold as a livable space. Heidegger put it precisely: it is not a matter of occupying time, but of “dwelling” in it from being.
Authenticity is not about being right or obtaining external validation. It is about reconciling oneself with what one has become. It is not about belonging to all environments, but about finding a place where it is not necessary to pretend. Laozi teaches that “the wise man does not show off, and therefore shines; he does not justify himself, and therefore convinces.” Authenticity does not seek applause. It generates silence. And in a world saturated with noise, that silence is the unmistakable sign of a presence that does not need to impose itself.
Seeking meaning is not a luxury reserved for exceptional moments. It is a structural necessity of existence. Living authentically is not an occasional privilege. It is a constant demand. It requires decision, renunciation, and vigilance. And when you fail, start again. And when you lose your direction, stop. Sometimes, it is enough to stop running away from silence to begin to see. As Simone Weil said, “Attention, taken in its highest sense, is the purest form of generosity.”
And then, without artifice or effort, life begins to reflect soberly who one is. And in that discreet correspondence between being and living, time ceases to be a race. It becomes a dwelling place.”
Prabhuji